Claim 1: Linings for single-surface and multiple-surface composite fillings
Claim 2: Core build-up prior to crown placement
Claim 3: Primary tooth fillings
Claim 4: Single-surface fillings in non-occlusal load-bearing areas
Claim 5: Stress bearing Class II restorations when the isthmus is less than half of the intercuspal distance and with at least one occlusal contact on enamel
Claim 6: Cervical fillings, if aesthetics is not the prime consideration
Claim 7: Uniplanar and multi-planar temporary fillings

Ketac Molar Aplicap
Clinical indication(s) / Claim(s)
Verbatim per manufacturer's Instructions-for-use (IFU) sheet

IFU Link
Clinical evidence supporting the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
Clinical evidence not supporting the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
Clinical evidence not related to the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
(c) RCHSR
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II  = 0 Criterion III  = 0 / Total score = 0
Kemoli AM, van Amerongen WE, Opinya GN. Short communication: Influence of different isolation methods on the survival of proximal ART restorations in primary molars after two years. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2010 Jun;11(3):136-9.
Claim 5:
Yu C, Gao XJ, Deng DM, Yip HK, Smales RJ. Survival of glass ionomer restorations placed in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and conventional cavity preparations: 2-year results. Int Dent J. 2004 Feb;54(1):42-6.
Claim 4:
Yu C, Gao XJ, Deng DM, Yip HK, Smales RJ. Survival of glass ionomer restorations placed in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and conventional cavity preparations: 2-year results. Int Dent J. 2004 Feb;54(1):42-6.

Yip KH, Smales RJ, Gao W, Peng D. The effects of two cavity preparation methods on the longevity of glass ionomer cement restorations: an evaluation after 12 months. J Am Dent Assoc. 2002 Jun;133(6):744-51.

Gao W, Peng D, Smales RJ, Yip KH. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months. Quintessence Int. 2003 Jan;34(1):31-7.

Claims 1 - 3, 5 - 7: